When you’ve been around the Internet for as long as I have, you will have noticed several changes, some for the better, and some for the worse. I’m not saying I’ve been around since the inception of the whole thing – that would be impossible given that I was born in the early 1980s, around the same time the Internet was. I wish I’d been around in the days of Gopher, and text based browsers, and when newsgroups were more the norm than sidelined as they are now. I’d say I first encountered the Internet in 1996 when my best friend’s family had it, and opened what was then uncommon, an Internet café sometime around 1996/7. I know it was definitely there in 1997 because that’s where I held my birthday party that year. Back in those early days, all I cared about was IRC, playing multiplayer Diablo over the network and/or Internet, and browsing a few basic Web sites about my favourite celebrities and TV shows.
I can remember when Alta Vista and Lycos were the most popular search engines, Netscape Navigator was the most widely used browser, and Google hadn’t yet made a mark.
Although Web design has developed quite extensively now that you are able to find quite a number of impressive Web sites designed with CSS, HTML, PHP, and sometimes a database backend (yes, these are my preferred methods of Web development) and there seems to be far less FrontPage, Microsoft Word and Flash designed sites out there, the Internet is far from being a better place. These days there is far less respect for what came before, with people still only just being introduced to the Internet. They do what they do on the Internet simply because everyone else is doing it.
This brings me to my current pet-peeve about how certain Web sites became as popular as they are. Not so long ago, MySpace was listed as the #1 most visited site on the Internet. I do not know how it has gained in popularity above other similar, and in some cases better, Web sites. It has some fancy bells and whistles, and a lot of celebrity memberships (that admittedly until Zach Braff I did not care about – but at least Zach Braff has his own personal Web blog on his own personal Web site). But why have celebrities chosen MySpace over any other Web site offering the same or similar services? Certainly it can’t be the design factor, as I find it one of the poorest designed sites I’ve ever seen – and what’s with the VB style labelling on the Mail inbox table headings? (Among other things). Is it the ability to have a Web presense without having to actually design and code something properly? Because, my friend, that is not a Web presense. And if you’re relatively unknown, how then are you supposed to be found amongst an apparent 100 million members (these statistics must be blown out of proportion; how could MySpace possibly have penetrated 10% of the Internet’s current population?) Perhaps it’s the fact that people are able to share videos and music, as well as all the other “standard” stuff like blogging and meeting new friends offered by MySpace. Though from what I’ve noticed at MySpace profiles is that maybe 50% of them actually use the blog aspect, and half the profiles aren’t even filled in, or at least more than a paragraph long. More evidence that people have only joined because everyone else has. Give me LiveJournal (LJ) over MySpace any day. At least LJ doesn’t expect you to add everyone back as a friend, and allows you to read all of your friends’ blogs on the same page. Not only that, you have the ability to lock your blog entries to particular people only. Oh, yeah, and I’d say the general proper use of the English language is more respected. At least LJ has a spellchecker, whether it’s used or not.
It is possible that I am just jealous that certain comedians have opted to use MySpace over creating a profile on my ComedyDownUnder.com (CDU) which has been, until recently, ranked #1 on Google for a search of “Australian Comedy.” Now it ranks at #2, second only to Wikipedia. Although CDU still has far more information than Wikipedia, it has led me to feel somewhat redundant – moreso than MySpace ever could. Why? Because Wikipedia is at least respected in the general online-for-more-than-two-years community, as opposed to MySpace. At least I can live in the safety of the idea that MySpace is only just a fad, and everyone will get sick of it just like everything else on the Internet. Nothing lasts forever.
This whole discovery with Wikipedia in particular has inspired me to actually go back to my roots and do something I actually once cared about. CDU has not been properly looked after since its renovations in October 2003 when I first introduced the members section with a database backend. I did not finish what I started out doing with that Web site and, granted, comedians who join do not have a lot of features to play with. However, with Broadband now gaining popularity and my access to video editing software, I am keen to include some videos available for download. I already have a few in mind, including (but not limited to) my short film Dead, which has already been uploaded to the Internet.
I did intend on writing more about the good old days from my memory, and perhaps not so much about the crap it’s turned to now, but it’s midnight and I’m tired, I’ve lost my urge to continue on. Until next time…